Latest Research Papers
2025-01-22
arXiv
Evolution and The Knightian Blindspot of Machine Learning
The paper highlights a critical blind spot in machine learning, specifically its inability to handle Knightian uncertainty, and contrasts this with the robustness of biological evolution. It argues for the importance of addressing this gap to create more robust AI, especially in open-world scenarios.
This paper claims that machine learning (ML) largely overlooks an important
facet of general intelligence: robustness to a qualitatively unknown future in
an open world. Such robustness relates to Knightian uncertainty (KU) in
economics, i.e. uncertainty that cannot be quantified, which is excluded from
consideration in ML's key formalisms. This paper aims to identify this blind
spot, argue its importance, and catalyze research into addressing it, which we
believe is necessary to create truly robust open-world AI. To help illuminate
the blind spot, we contrast one area of ML, reinforcement learning (RL), with
the process of biological evolution. Despite staggering ongoing progress, RL
still struggles in open-world situations, often failing under unforeseen
situations. For example, the idea of zero-shot transferring a self-driving car
policy trained only in the US to the UK currently seems exceedingly ambitious.
In dramatic contrast, biological evolution routinely produces agents that
thrive within an open world, sometimes even to situations that are remarkably
out-of-distribution (e.g. invasive species; or humans, who do undertake such
zero-shot international driving). Interestingly, evolution achieves such
robustness without explicit theory, formalisms, or mathematical gradients. We
explore the assumptions underlying RL's typical formalisms, showing how they
limit RL's engagement with the unknown unknowns characteristic of an
ever-changing complex world. Further, we identify mechanisms through which
evolutionary processes foster robustness to novel and unpredictable challenges,
and discuss potential pathways to algorithmically embody them. The conclusion
is that the intriguing remaining fragility of ML may result from blind spots in
its formalisms, and that significant gains may result from direct confrontation
with the challenge of KU.
2024-04-25
arXiv
A Survey of Generative Search and Recommendation in the Era of Large Language Models
The paper surveys the emerging paradigm of generative search and recommendation driven by large language models, providing a unified framework to categorize and analyze existing works. It highlights unique challenges, open problems, and future directions in this field.
With the information explosion on the Web, search and recommendation are
foundational infrastructures to satisfying users' information needs. As the two
sides of the same coin, both revolve around the same core research problem,
matching queries with documents or users with items. In the recent few decades,
search and recommendation have experienced synchronous technological paradigm
shifts, including machine learning-based and deep learning-based paradigms.
Recently, the superintelligent generative large language models have sparked a
new paradigm in search and recommendation, i.e., generative search (retrieval)
and recommendation, which aims to address the matching problem in a generative
manner. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey of the emerging
paradigm in information systems and summarize the developments in generative
search and recommendation from a unified perspective. Rather than simply
categorizing existing works, we abstract a unified framework for the generative
paradigm and break down the existing works into different stages within this
framework to highlight the strengths and weaknesses. And then, we distinguish
generative search and recommendation with their unique challenges, identify
open problems and future directions, and envision the next information-seeking
paradigm.